Refusal By Supreme Court to Hear Case.

fishbowl
My article touches a very distinct and important fact and opinion in my case; about today's what you might call "systems". A German citizen Khaled El-Masri who claimed he was detained by American Agents on his vacation and taken to Afghanistan. He claims that there he was tortured and beaten for 5 months in a secret prison before being realised. He was believed to be a terrorist who had the same name, he was released however after figuring out that he wasn't. This however is just back round on the real topic at heart here. The Supreme court refused to hear his appeal and denied his case because they thought it might reveal information that the public shouldn't know. And that anything or any case which might do such a thing is taken as irrelevant.Hm; Well this may only just prove the point of Khaled, that something did happen. I take this to heart as well however, if I had something traitorous happen to me against good and against justice, I would want something done about it. And isn't that supposedly what America is all about? justice, freedom ,a right to just about anything? This defeats the entire purpose of this. What makes this mans case irrelevant than something else that may have happened in the world?I would be furious if someone did this to me. Said no to my appeal; just push me and what I have to say aside.It doesn't matter what a case will reveal, the truth is most important in the realm of revealing things. That man deserves a case, whether he is lieng or not it doesn't matter, if hes telling the truth than America is just doing what we supposedly are against. I call that hypocritisism, and I can deal with something or someone like that. Its unbelievable, and against all my beliefs.